Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041122153035.E41705@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > Josh, Robert, people: > >>> Whether you "like" it is opinion (highly dependent on the proximity of >>> your browser settings to those of the designer in the fixed widht world). >> Ahh your second point is still very much an opinion. It doesn't >> matter how much you state it as a fact, it is still an opinion. > > Can we kill this now? We're none of us so rich in free time that flames are > necessary. > > From what I can tell, Fixed-width vs. Variable-width is a *tradeoff*, and you > gain and lose things either way. Let me sum up the pros for each: > > Fixed-Width > -- Supports more polished designs > -- More "corporate" > -- supports better visual organization of navigation > -- better for websites with many images > -- cuts down on scrolling > -- emphasizes design > > Variable-Width > -- Supports a greater variety of browser/language settings > -- More "open source" > -- better for large quantities of text content > -- emphasizes content > > Do people agree with the above points? I think that about sums it up ... not sure about the more "open source" vs "corporate", but for arguments sake, okay :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: