Re: Test database for new installs?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test database for new installs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200411221106.55802.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Test database for new installs? ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Test database for new installs?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas, Andrew, > You might be right for small dbs, but a temperature database will likely > contain millions of rows, if filled in the real world. varchar will > probably make the table several times bigger than needed. Yeah, INT keys are useful for performance reasons. It depends on the table. I often find that text keys are often more useful for short lookup lists because it allows me to avoid linking in dozens of tables in a star-schema OLAP database. There I usually find that the efficiency gained by the smaller size of the INT column is more than offset by the cost and decrease in estimate accuracy inherent in adding a bunch of lookup tables to the query. Also, for tables where the text key is required in the table, *adding* an additional INT column as a key is no improvement in performance. > Additionally, I regretted *every* case where I decided to use some text > data as key, sooner or later. Well, obviously you and I have had different workloads then. > We will probably find that *everthing* each of us does will offend somebody > else. I'm not too keen to get into "best practice" wars. That's what IRC is > for ;-) <grin> > I would like to see a number of samples, which demonstrate different design > methodologies/philosophies, so we are offending everyone with equal > opportunity. Yeah, that would be great. --Josh -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: