Re: server auto-restarts and ipcs
От | Ed L. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: server auto-restarts and ipcs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200411081928.57211.pgsql@bluepolka.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: server auto-restarts and ipcs ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: server auto-restarts and ipcs
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Monday November 8 2004 7:24, Ed L. wrote: > On Monday November 8 2004 6:16, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes: > > > A power failure led to failed postmaster restart using 7.4.6 (see > > > output below). The short-term fix is usually to delete the pid file > > > and restart. > > > > > > I often wonder why ipcs never seems to show the shared memory > > > block in question? > > > > The shared memory block would certainly not still exist after a system > > reboot, so what we have here is a misleading error message. Looking at > > the code, the most plausible explanation appears to be that > > shmctl(IPC_STAT) is failing (which it ought to) and returning some > > errno code different from EINVAL (which is the case we are expecting to > > see). What platform are you on, and what does its shmctl(2) man page > > document as error conditions? > > Platform is Linux 2.4.20-30.9 on i686 (Pentium 4, I think). I recently saw this same thing happen from a power failure on several HPUX boxes as well (I think running B.11.00/11.23 with 7.3.4/7.3.7, but not sure). Ed
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: