Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep()
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200411072015.iA7KFCR10464@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_arch.c call to sleep() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > We have the following warning on Windows: > > pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep' > > > To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be > > <stdlib.h> in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace the call by a > > call to pg_usleep(). > > <stdlib.h> is included automatically by c.h, so that surely won't fix it. > > I have some recollection that we invented pg_usleep in part because we > wanted to not use sleep() at all in the backend, but I don't recall why > (and the reasoning might not apply to the archiver process, anyway). I think usleep was so we could accept signals during the sleep. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: