Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041103202103.B82047@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Justin Clift wrote: >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> <snip> >> >>> Do a vacuum full analyze on the two databases being called, and load time >>> went from 2.4sec to .46sec: >> >> >> Hmmmm, is there any chance your Free Space Map settings aren't high enough? >> > > I could be wrong but my understanding is that pg_autovacuum won't vacuum > system tables so eventually you still need to perform a full vacuum (not > neccessarily a vacuum full). > > Could this be the issue? I just setup a weekly cron to do a vacuum full ... I didn't realize that pg_autovacuum didn't catch it all, except, of course, I should have clued in when we had that fun with the banner database, where an index on a 12 row table was faster then no index :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: