Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041103201625.S82047@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Justin Clift wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > <snip> >> Do a vacuum full analyze on the two databases being called, and load time >> went from 2.4sec to .46sec: > > Hmmmm, is there any chance your Free Space Map settings aren't high enough? I posted once asking about that, but got no responses :) Here is a vacuum verbose on gborg's database: INFO: free space map: 1000 relations, 7454 pages stored; 23072 total pages needed DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 20000 pages = 178 kB shared memory. and this is portal: INFO: free space map: 1000 relations, 7425 pages stored; 23024 total pages needed DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 20000 pages = 178 kB shared memory. so, you tell me ... should I increase them? I haven't been able to find any docs that talk about this :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: