Re: persistence of java objects
От | Ulrich Meis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: persistence of java objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200410312129.57710.kenobi@halifax.rwth-aachen.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | persistence of java objects ("jessica xingzc_he" <xingzc_he@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Sunday 31 October 2004 01:05, jessica xingzc_he wrote: > hi, > > Does postgresql support this? if i want a column of a table for the > persistence of instance of java objects, and use ResultSet.getObject() and > ResultSet.updateObjecct() to access them. if so, what data type the column > should be? If you use a standard type like integer or varchar, you can do things like setObject(1,new Integer(5)); setObject(2,"something"); which would be equivalent to setInteger(1,new Integer(5)); setString(2,"something"); If you want to store complex objects in the database then they should implement the java.io.serializable interface. Thereby you can store them in a byteArray or push them into a bytearraystream and write the result with the usual methods into the database. A simple serialization example is here for java.io.File: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/serialization/spec/examples.doc1.html Regards, Uli
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: