Re: Question Regarding Locks
От | Karsten Hilbert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question Regarding Locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041028181505.A2423@hermes.hilbert.loc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question Regarding Locks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question Regarding Locks
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Just so that I am not getting this wrong: > BTW, a handy proxy for "row has not changed" is to see if its XMIN > system column is still the same as before. Considering that my business objects remember XMIN from when they first got the row would the following sequence make sure I am in good shape ? begin; select ... for update; update ... set ... where my_pk=<my_pk_value> AND xmin=<the_old_xmin> This should either update 1 row in which case I can commit or zero rows in which case I need to rollback and handle the merge conflict. The reasoning would be that the condition my_pk=my_pk_value would select the row I am interested in while xmin=the_old_xmin would ensure that row hasn't been modified. Am I right or is there a flaw in my thinking ? Thanks, Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: