Re: Why is abstime type deprecated?
От | Kilian Hagemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is abstime type deprecated? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200410271708.07348.hagemann1@egs.uct.ac.za обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is abstime type deprecated? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is abstime type deprecated?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> > Because it will certainly break by 2038, when 32-bit time_t overflows. > > In practice, Unix systems will have to move to 64-bit time_t before > that, and we'll probably either remove abstime or make it an 8-byte type > as soon as that practice is common. Thanks for that. By that time my storage requirements will certainly have changed, but I guess this transformation won't happen in a hurry... I'd like to see abstime supported until at least 2020. > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? I have, and it doesn't have an entry on this. Don't know who maintains the FAQ, but I think it would be worthwhile adding this issue to the FAQ. -- Kilian Hagemann Climate Systems Analysis Group University of Cape Town Republic of South Africa Tel(w): ++27 21 650 2748
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: