Re: a bug in pg_dump?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a bug in pg_dump? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041019190647.GB5625@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a bug in pg_dump? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: a bug in pg_dump?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:25:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jaime Casanova <systemguards@yahoo.com> writes: > > but when i do a: pg_dump -C uescc > uescc.sql > > it add the create statement for the database but not > > add appropiates alter database for the parameters i > > set search_path in this case. > > > But, pg_dumpall does. > > > a bug in pg_dump? > > No. That functionality is assigned to pg_dumpall. There doesn't seem to be a way of extracting only database creation from pg_dumpall. Or the schema of a single database, for example. There _is_ a functionality gap here. ISTM pg_dump -C (which dumps CREATE DATABASE) should dump ALTER DATABASE commands too. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) You liked Linux a lot when he was just the gawky kid from down the block mowing your lawn or shoveling the snow. But now that he wants to date your daughter, you're not so sure he measures up. (Larry Greenemeier)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: