Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Reusable pl/pgsql

On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:08, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > I've
> > no problem sticking with your road map if you feel that's where we need
> > to go, but I've also no problem letting different people work
> > independently and going with whatever solution comes out first (sort of
> > ansari xprize style)
>
> We're fond of doing that as a community.   Unfortunately, with each
> separate developer working on each separate solution, often nothing gets
> finished.   I personally don't see any value in fragmented efforts just so
> that people don't have to work with anyone else's code.   We're an OSS
> project, we're supposed to be about *pooling* talent/code.

Fair enough.  But I can bring up several cases where waiting to implement a
preferred solution meant nothing getting done at all.

Bruce has sent me the cookbook code, I plan to look at it and see how feasible
it is to get it up and running.  Also, I looked in the bug list for the
pgfoundry project and didn't see anything about the broken code snippits
problem, perhaps you can post a bug in there and shoot me a link?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL