Re: plperl features

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We expected this to a degree of course, but if we can get some of
> > them in, it would be nice for the community
> > who wants to use plPerl.
>
> On the other hand, it wouldn't be that nice for the community that
> respects a good freeze.  As you know, there will always be one more
> feature.
>
> Considering that we're already a long time into the beta phase, and
> we're still working out portability issues especially in the various
> plug-ins, we really ought to be strict about the freeze in that area if
> we ever want to get finished.

Agreed.  This is the downside of being bundled with the server.  Sorry.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073