Re: Log line prefix on win32
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Log line prefix on win32 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200410081702.i98H2Zw17949@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Log line prefix on win32 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Log line prefix on win32
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I am still trying to figure out a good way to fix this. On unix my log > > shows EDT but Win32 shows US/Eastern and some zones are much longer. > > Should we add %z and not print the timezone information for %t? That > > seems like the only reasonable solution. > > %z is not standard --- you won't find it in the SUS spec for instance. > Or were you thinking of exposing this problem at the API level by making > people write a separate log_line_prefix item to get the timezone? I'm I was thinking of adding %z as an option to log_line prefix, so to get the current output you would do '%t %z'. I was not suggesting changing the %Z passed to strftime if they ask for timezone. > not thrilled about institutionalizing such a fix for a platform-specific > issue that might go away later (if we switch to using our own timezone > code here, for instance). Right. > I'd be inclined to #ifdef elog's strftime calls so that the zone is > omitted on Windows but not elsewhere. Kinda ugly but it's a localized > fix that we can easily improve later. Yes, we could go that way too. The decision is a platform-specific change or omitting it for all outputs. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: