Re: semicolon not required on END statement
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: semicolon not required on END statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200410020048.i920mjB03184@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: semicolon not required on END statement (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: semicolon not required on END statement
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Improved wording that doesn't telegraph, "Look at me!": Each declaration and each statement within a block is terminated by a semicolon, though the final <literal>END</literal> that concludes a function does not require one. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 13:46, Tom Lane wrote: > > We specifically do not require a semicolon at the very end of the > > function definition. > > Yeah, makes sense. Attached is a doc patch. Barring any objections I'll > apply it to HEAD by end-of-day today. > > -Neil > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: