Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200409301106.36316.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
Tom, > A different semi-legitimate reason for a cutoff is that, so far as I > know, the comp.databases.postgresql newsgroups never went through the > formal vote process to be recognized as legitimate mainstream > newsgroups. Back when I was a netnews administrator for CMU, it was > common practice to refuse to carry groups that hadn't passed such a > vote, and I imagine it still is. I haven't heard that Google is getting > strict about this (and they sure didn't mention it in their comments) > but if they are then we don't have much of a leg to stand on. If that's the case, then, they should inform us and we can start a campaign. But right now we're getting the brushoff and we need to get their attention. BTW, how would we go about organizing a legitimacy vote? Who votes on this? -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: