Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
От | Markus Schaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040916153821.1d5716ca@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Steve, On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:17:03 -0700 Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > > But you have to add table constraints restricting the time after adding > > the partition? > > Uhm... unless I'm confused that's not a meaningful thing in this context. > There's no rule that's putting insertions into an inherited table - the > decision of which inherited table to insert into is made at application > level. I thought of the query optimizer. I thought it could use the table constraints to drop tables when creating the union. But now I think that an index gives enough win, because the tree-based indices are rather quick at returning zero rows when the queried value is out of the indexed range. Greetings, Markus -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: