Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
От | Markus Schaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040914141452.002e5d4e@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- merge tables (Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Mischa, On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:47:17 GMT Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com> wrote: > On the other hand, if you do warehouse-style loading (Insert, or PG > COPY, into a temp table; and then 'upsert' into the perm table), I can > guarantee 2500 inserts/sec is no problem. As we can forsee that we'll have similar insert rates to cope with in the not-so-far future, what do you mean with 'upsert'? Do you mean a stored procedure that iterates over the temp table? Generally, what is the fastest way for doing bulk processing of update-if-primary-key-matches-and-insert-otherwise operations? Thanks, Markus Schaber -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: