Re: pg_locks view and user locks
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_locks view and user locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200409132136.20025.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_locks view and user locks ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_locks view and user locks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure wrote: > Second, > Is there a reason why user level locks are completely undocumented? > AFAICT, There is no mention of them in anywhere in the docs, > particularly 12.4, which describes methods for application managed > concurrency. The availability of cooperative long term locks is > (IMO) a really nice feature, particularly for people porting legacy > applications which depend on explicit locking (there is some good > info in the user lock module which is unfortunately under the GPL). That's the whole problem. I don't think anyone objects to the user lock principle, but as long as it's GPL, we won't support it. It was probably a mistake to accept this module in the first place. I believe some people have been trying to get the module relicensed, but that evidently never happened. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: