Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040910091241.54623.qmail@web52409.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAccess via ssh? (Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer
Re: Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer |
Список | pgsql-novice |
now that i've gotten all the problems setting up my development box out of the way, i need to focus in on actually programming my applications. i'm using php/apache/pgsql. the way i see it, i have three choices. 1. pg api - all my books cover this approach and it is kinda cool. ;-) downside is it locks you into pgsql (not to big a deal) and you have to code like a monster to get all your classes and functions together. 2. pear - has some neat functions and classes pre made - plug and play, as it were. however, i'd still have a lot to learn using this style of programming b/c i've never used before. i feel mor comfortable with pg's api right now. 3. adodb - this just started sounding compelling about 30 minutes ago. seems to be faster and more portable than pear. seems to have some nice functionality, too. not sure if it has the same level of class/function support - need to read up on this. as a rookie, i appreciate the wisdon gained over windows broken on second floors as monitors get tossed out of them... ;-) if you have something to say that you think is of value, please chime in. tia... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: