Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040903201154.GB69298@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:12:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 13:00 schrieb Eyinagho Newton: > > Part of my final year thesis involves creating a > > database using PostgreSQL. As a way of documentation, > > is it correct to say that PosgreSQL belongs to the > > fifth generation of database management systems? Where > > does MySQL fall into? The fourth generation? > > I'm not aware of any generally accepted definitions of generations of database > management systems. Nor am I, but I'd say MySQL would be at least 2 if not 3 or 4 generations behind PostgreSQL if there was such a thing :). PostgreSQL would also be a generation or two behind Oracle. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: