Re: pgAccess via ssh?
От | Oliver Fromme |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAccess via ssh? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200409031109.i83B9UdH096361@lurza.secnetix.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAccess via ssh? (Ron St-Pierre <rstpierre@syscor.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgAccess via ssh?
Re: pgAccess via ssh? |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Ron St-Pierre wrote: > You don't need to putty into the box to use pgAdmin, you just tell > pgAdmin the ip address, user (postgres), > and password (unless it's trusted). This works as long as you've allowed > access from your remote ip address > eg in /data/pg_hba.conf you might have something like this > host all all 24.233.244.45 255.255.255.255 trust > this line trusts all users connecting from 24.233.244.45, so for example > pgAdmin could gain db access. > > > No Cygwin necessary for this situation? > > > No cygwin needed. However, in that case the DB connection will _not_ be through ssh, so it will be unencrypted and insecure. From Mike's initial mail I got the impression that he wanted the connection to the PostgreSQL server to go through ssh (which is basically a good thing, because you get ssh's authentication and encryption features). Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. > Can the denizens of this group enlighten me about what the > advantages of Python are, versus Perl ? "python" is more likely to pass unharmed through your spelling checker than "perl". -- An unknown poster and Fredrik Lundh
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: