Re: Still a loose end in GUC USERLIMIT stuff
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Still a loose end in GUC USERLIMIT stuff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200409010251.i812pt724338@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Still a loose end in GUC USERLIMIT stuff (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > As of CVS tip, an increase in a USERLIMIT parameter in postgresql.conf > will be enforced against the sessions of superusers as well as everyone > else. That's because I ifdef'd out this code: > > /* > * If user is a superuser, he gets to keep his setting. We can't check > * this unless inside a transaction, though. XXX in practice that > * restriction means this code is essentially worthless, because the > * result will depend on whether we happen to be inside a transaction > * block when SIGHUP arrives. Dike out until we can think of something > * that actually works. > */ > #ifdef NOT_USED > if (IsTransactionState() && superuser()) > return false; > #endif > > It'd be better if it worked as originally intended, but this code cannot > be made to do that with any reliability. > > The superuser() test has another problem besides what I mentioned in the > comment, which is that its result will vary depending on SET SESSION > AUTHORIZATION, SECURITY INVOKER function calls, and so on; so it might > return an indication that has nothing to do with the privileges that > were used when the GUC variable was set. > > Offhand the only reasonable way I can see to handle this is that *when a > setting is made* we set a flag bit on the GUC variable showing whether > it was set by a superuser or not, and then check that flag rather than > the current superuser state when deciding whether to override the value. > I am not sure it's really worth the trouble though. Also this would not > be exactly the original coding intention, I think, because the original > code attempted to protect the superuser's effective setting whether he > had explicitly set the value or just inherited it from postgresql.conf. This is tough, but looking at CVS it doesn't appear as you showed above. Is there a later email that hasn't arrived yet? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: