Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
От | Jim Buttafuoco |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040830171130.M90360@contactbda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, I have confirmed that 7.4.3 works on the cobalt raq mipsel system. I have not looked at the s_lock.[ch] code as I have not coded in C for years and don't know the backend code very well. Do you have any ideas? Jim ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: jim@contactbda.com Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel > "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com> writes: > > Shouldn't this also work on mipsel CPU's? > > It should work on a real MIPS CPU. The PlayStation 2 has a dumbed-down > MIPS chip without the TAS instruction :-(, but now that we've eliminated > that point I think you've found a problem. We made several > reorganizations in the spinlock code between 7.4 and 8.0 that could > possibly have broken the platforms we were not testing on --- can you > take a look at the changes in s_lock.h and s_lock.c and see where we > went wrong? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match ------- End of Original Message -------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: