Re: Gentoo for production DB server?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Gentoo for production DB server? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040826030244.GR53563@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Gentoo for production DB server? (Greg Donald <greg.donald@nukote.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0500, Greg Donald wrote: > On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 16:33, Christine Desmuke wrote: > > At the risk of starting a flame-war, I'd like some more details on the > > use of Gentoo Linux for a production PostgreSQL server. There have been > > a couple of comments lately that it is not such a great idea; does > > anyone have specific experience they'd be willing to share? > > I used Gentoo for a long time on my home systems but I recently quit. > > It's a "fun" distro as far as the options and all, and it has a great > user community for support.. but I got tired of the Gentoo developers > (whether intentional or not) pushing out new stuff marked as "stable" > when it obviously was not. The price was right and I knew going in I Agreed. > For stability, db/web server usage and such, I'd go with Debian. > For features, desktop systems, etc., I'd go with Suse. 9.1 is > impressive. > For security, firewall, or router usage, I'd go with *BSD. Actually, FreeBSD is an outstanding platform for stability as well. They offer -current, -stable, and security branches depending on how much instability you can tolerate. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: