Re: PGSQL and XML
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGSQL and XML |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200408241455.37460.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PGSQL and XML (<operationsengineer1@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hey, > Should I evaluate XML and XSL to see if it makes more sense using it than > PHP scripting? That's completely up to you. I will point out, though, that: a) XML is a document spefication, not a programming language, so I am highly suspicious of attempts to turn it into one. This is not a statement on the products referenced, as I've never seen them in action, just a statement that you should evaluate them skeptically. b) at least 50% of the value of any programming language is in the community and modules available for it. This makes Java and Perl more valuable than PHP and Ruby, and any of those much more valuable than BOX, currently. Of course, things change. >Is keeping the business logic separate from the > presentation important enough to switch technologies (at least I'm at the > beginning stages)? It is important, but it can certainly be done in PHP. Use OO-PHP. Or use stored procedures (functions) for your business logic; I'm fond of that approach with PHP. > What is this Box stuff? Never heard of it before your e-mail. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: