Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200408181638.i7IGcYs03902@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > I thought the report was that *only* 255.255.255.255 failed. The > > question is why? > > The impression I got was that some internal subroutine of getaddrinfo > had a broken error-handling convention (ie, "return a numeric address > value or -1 on error"). > > > And would changing the hints passed to getaddrinfo_all > > improve matters (e.g. by filling in the ai_family with the value from > > the addr structure we already have)? > > Seems unlikely. I suppose you could argue that we shouldn't be using > getaddrinfo on the netmask field at all; there's certainly not any value > in doing a DNS lookup on it, for instance. Maybe we should go back to > using plain ol' inet_aton for it? (Nah, won't handle IPv6...) Uh, we are passing 255.255.255.255 to getaddrinfo()? Why would we do that? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: