Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > So, for the issue at hand, no matter how much we like replication,
> > endorse slony, or respect Jan's work, it's not part of PostgreSQL, in
> > the eyes of the public. And a press release or three isn't going to
> > fundamentally change that, because the facts don't back it up.
>
> Do we not make some headway towards that with the work on pgxs? I realize
> that only addresses part of the problem, but it does make a start ...
>
> How do we continue to 'bridge the gap', so to say?
>
> pginstaller does, I think, a good job of it on the Windows platform, by
> giving one interface to pull in multiple 'tools' ... any way of mirroring
> this sort of thing in Unix?
I think Peter gave the wisest analysis:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> About half a year ago I was thinking exactly the same thing as what you
> just wrote. But I realized that there is virtually no room for a
> "PostgreSQL distribution" to live between people who always download
> the original sources and people who want the full service of their
> operating system's package management. I have since joined a community
> maintained Linux distribution and now I have no problem getting all the
> PostgreSQL software I need.
Meaning we can't provide a merged product without knowing OS details,
and those require people on each platform to provide such solutions.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073