Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200408122049.i7CKnmM24198@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > >>I am more and more coming to the conclusion that we should either remove > >>NT4 as a supported platform, or at least surround it with very > >>significant caveats. M$ is about to end the last remaining bit of > >>support for it, and has already stopped publishing non-security fixes. > >> > >>It looks like there are lots of legacy installations still out there > >>(heck, I see lots of RH7.3 and it's also out of support). > >> > >>But there isn't any legacy native W32 Postgres, so we would not be > >>affecting any legacy users by not supporting NT4. > >> > >> > > > >What is the downside of supporting NT4 if we can? > > > > > > > > It's that "if" I am concerned about. I think Dave and Merlin have just > showed us that, in addition to the eventlog limitations, there are > enough other reasons to say we really can't. > > As for Andreas' point about people wanting to try PostgreSQL out on > low-cost platforms, if they need Windows they can use Cygwin still, and > otherwise they can use Linux or FreeBSD. > > The point is that we have limited resources, and should not strain them > trying to support a platform that is itself unsupported and that makes > life difficult/impossible for us. If we had legacy users it might be a > different story. I guess I am waiting for someone to report it doesn't work on NT4 SP4. How do we know it doesn't work? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: