Re: [HACKERS] SAVEPOINT syntax again
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SAVEPOINT syntax again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200408120326.i7C3QUp13906@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SAVEPOINT syntax again (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SAVEPOINT syntax again
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> writes: > > Oracle has ROLLBACK TO [ SAVEPOINT ] <savepoint specifier> > > DB2 has ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT <savepoint specifier> > > I would go with Oracle's lead here, first because they are the de facto > standard, and second because I don't want to have to type out SAVEPOINT > every time I use one of these commands. > > > <release savepoint statement> ::= RELEASE SAVEPOINT <savepoint specifier> > > > Oracle does not have RELEASE SAVEPOINT. > > DB2 has RELEASE [ TO ] SAVEPOINT <savepoint specifier> > > I'd vote for RELEASE [ SAVEPOINT ] <name> (for brevity, and for > consistency with ROLLBACK). I feel no urge to copy DB2. Are we ever going to use "RELEASE" for prepared statements? If so making SAVEPOINT optional might be a bad idea. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: