Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200408010043.32944.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before > 7.0? That was just to avoid having to release a 6.6.6, which Jan had clearly been working towards. :-) Seriously, major version jumps correspond to epoch-like changes, like when the code moved out of Berkeley, or when we switched from bug fixing to adding features. Maybe the next epoch would be after a hostile takeover of firebird. But right now I see no epoch change, just a potential for confusing users. Consistency and humbleness can be a virtue. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: