Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040723204036.GY7751@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:30:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > > I don't consider the concept broken. The implementation is, in > > fact, broken, and putting that broken piece in the tutorial is, > > imnsho, a bad mistake. > > If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which > any aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable > to become quite short. Are there other pieces that are broken? As far as I know, the only documented feature in PostgreSQL that is is table inheritance. Anyhow, there are lots of ways to highlight the object-relational features that PostgreSQL provides. Table inheritance just isn't a good one. Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: