Re: surrogate key or not?
От | sad |
---|---|
Тема | Re: surrogate key or not? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407211430.16674.sad@bankir.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: surrogate key or not? (Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 14:58, Markus Bertheau wrote: > > 4) Replication: to identify an object of ANY type (record of any table > > regardless to datamodel), to store lists of deleted or modified objects > > (regardless to datamodel) > > That sounds like a datamodel on data that belongs to another data model, that's right, these surr. keys actually belong to a metadata model, but it is also useful to references of a data model. and they are used this way. > > 5) Making a primary key: if there is no real key at all. > > When there's no key at all, there can't be a surrogate key, as I > understand it. In such cases a generated unique number comes in handy, > and it's a real primary key and no surrogate key. ...right. in case (5) we construct another datamodel indeed. with an artifichial real key :-) P.S. r u from Russia ?
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: