Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

Philip Warner wrote:
> At 12:59 PM 21/07/2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >Yes, no need for it.  We discourage that.
>
> Might be polite, not to mention legally required, to check with the author
> of the patch first.

To be clear, we will ask the author if we can remove it, and if they say
no, we will reject the patch.

That's not a polite way to put it, but it is our procedure.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073