Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200407152317.47506.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > Certainly, I'm not saying it shuold change (I've given that up by > now). But the difference would be that if you used -W with initdb, it > would change the default *for that installation*. > Initdb-with-no-parameters would stay the same to keep people who > don't know about the switches happier. The fallacy with this line of thought is that it assumes that one authentication scheme applies to all ways of connecting. Often, the postgres account is not password protected for local access, for the benefit of autovacuum and that sort of maintenance. Still I might like passwords for remote access. The bottom line is, the user has to figure this out himself. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: