Re: How to display privileges in psql
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to display privileges in psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407151856.i6FIuDk02304@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to display privileges in psql (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:41:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Maybe other people want to comment on this issue. > > > > > > So far, \z and \dp have shown privileges of tables. > > > > > > Now \dn+ and \db+ show the privileges of schemas and tablespaces. > > > > > > Should we, for consistency, move the table privilege display to \dt+, or > > > should we move the schema and tablespace display to, say \zn and \zb? Or > > > maybe this is not an issue at all. > > > > Now that you mention it, it does seem nice to show permissions in \dt+. > > IMHO the \dn+ output would get too wide if you do that. I'd be in favor > of using \z<letter> to display permissions of the object in \d<letter> Is the new \db+ and \dn+ too wide now? Actually it looks like \db+ is fine but \dn+ is long because it has both permissions and a description:test=> \dt+ List of relations Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Description--------+------+-------+----------+-------------public | test | table | postgres |(1 row)test=> \db+ List of tablespaces Name | Owner | Location | Access privileges------------+----------+----------+-------------------pg_default | postgres | | pg_global | postgres| |(2 rows)test=> \dn+ List of schemas Name | Owner | Access privileges | Description--------------------+----------+-------------------------------------+---------------------------------- information_schema| postgres | {postgres=UC/postgres,=U/postgres} | pg_catalog | postgres | {postgres=UC/postgres,=U/postgres} | System catalog schema pg_toast | postgres | | Reserved schema for TOAST tables public | postgres | {postgres=UC/postgres,=UC/postgres} | Standard publicschema(4 rows) > Something that annoys me is that the \? shows > > \dt description of what it does ... > add + for more details > > where it should be > > \dt[+] same description > > No need to say what the + does, it should be obvious. Good idea. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: