Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> We could certainly do something along that line if we had a few people 
> willing to be "gatekeepers".  We'd have to work harder at making the 
> release generation process open and documented though.  Right now there 
> are plenty of steps that only you, Bruce, or Lamar (respectively) know 
> how to do...

I think we could do it if we restricted it to *just* one release back ... 
but I do agree with Peter about ppls motivations for upgrading (bug fixes 
vs new features) ... we'd have to have a 'two branch stable', one would be 
only bug fixes, the other would be bug fixes+feature backpatch ... would 
could get interesting trying to figure out release naming conventions :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664