Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407122011.i6CKBg018849@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > > Is it really such a good idea to have "trust" authentication enabled for > > localhost (TCP/IP and Unix sockets) by default? > > No, but none of the others are better. See previous discussions in the > archives. I don't think the situation has changed any since the last > time we hashed this out. If they supply a password to initdb, shouldn't we then require a password in pg_hba.conf. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: