Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
От | elein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040712173234.M6381@cookie.varlena.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It has probably be said before, but new users need to be able to get up and running on their *development* system quickly. Throwing new users for a loop with the password configuration issues would be a problem. Most people would put up a test server first anyway in order to check things out and configure as necessary. --elein On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes: > > IMO, forcing su password at initdb time (allowing blank password with a > > very stern warning) and bumping localhost to auth is the right way to > > go. > > This isn't happening for a number of reasons, the most obvious being > that we cannot require initdb to be run interactively. (That stern > warning will not impress /dev/null.) > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: