Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407121244.23532.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter, > There is no conflict. If a company calls itself PostgreSQL, Inc., then > it will logically use the PostgreSQL elephant as its logo. If you feel > there is a conflict then the conflict is really a company calling > itself PostgreSQL, Inc. That was not particularly wise, but I don't > really consider it a problem. But the logo is really a much smaller > subset problem. You missed part of Lamar's commentary: apparently the BEH logo belonged to PostgreSQL Inc. and we started using it, not the other way around. So the logo is theirs and we copied it. Which *definitely* wasn't smart. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: