Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407102033.i6AKXwd20730@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > > > In other words: > > > SAVEPOINT == BEGIN NESTED > > > RELEASE SAVEPOINT == COMMIT NESTED > > > ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT == ROLLBACK NESTED > > > > Here it should be: > > > > ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT == ROLLBACK NESTED; SAVEPOINT; > > > > And just to clearify, this is an extension to the spec that we then have > > to support for a long time. Adding this now and then replacing it with the > > standard syntax is not very sexy. If we add this we should support > > it "for ever". > > Just to clarify, this is to allow rolling back to the same savepoint > multiple times. If we named savepoints, the new savepoint would be the > same name as the one we just rolled back. Sorry, I confused folks. I should have corrected this line too: > > ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT == ROLLBACK NESTED; BEGIN NESTED; It is not a non-standard behavior. It is only an implementation detail used internally that allows nested transactions to implement savepoints. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: