Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message
От | elein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040710135622.A6381@cookie.varlena.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
FYI: I'm agreeing w/Tom who is agreeing with me. The tag change should be good. I do hope people are not relying on seeing COMMIT when the transaction rolled back. It does not seem that in this case they would. elein On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:13:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > As I remember, the big issue was how often applications are looking and > > comparing these tags to take actions. I think we should return ROLLBACK > > on COMMIT failure and we can see if we get any problem reports during > > beta. > > Good enough; I'll make it happen. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: