Re: Replication in main PostgreSQL codebase

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Christopher is correct ... if there was such a thing as an 'end all, be
> all' replication solution, there wouldn't be a half a dozen different ones
> out there ...
>
> It would be unwise for *anyone* to state "never" as far as inclusion of
> built-in replication, but since the general consensus is that there is no
> such thing as the 'all-encompassing solution' for this, the chances of one
> ever coming about that would be of a scope that would be acceptable to be
> built-in is next to zero ...

OK, I reworded the replication TODO section and moved it under
Administration:

* Improve replication solutions
        o Automatic failover
        o Load balancing
        o Master/slave replication
        o Multi-master replication
        o Partition data across servers
        o Queries across databases or servers (two-phase commit)
        o Allow replication over unreliable or non-persistent links

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073