Re: client_min_messages in dumps?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: client_min_messages in dumps? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200407061436.i66Ea9l24877@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: client_min_messages in dumps? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: client_min_messages in dumps?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I agree changing some of those noiser notices would be good. I think > > the best idea would be to add a client_min_messages level of novice for > > them. > > Yes ... > > > In fact, looking at the code, I see that the INFO level is almost > > never used in our code. Perhaps we should just downgrade them to > > INFO-level messages. > > No! That is not a downgrade --- INFO messages are *not suppressable*. Uh, postgresql.conf has:#client_min_messages = notice # Values, in order of decreasing detail: # debug5, debug4, debug3, debug2, debug1, # log, info, notice, warning, error#log_min_messages= notice # Values, in order of decreasing detail: # debug5, debug4,debug3, debug2, debug1, # info, notice, warning, error, log, fatal, # panic I also don't see LOG used much in the code at all. It seems to be used mostly by VACUUM and ANALYZE. Seems something is wrong. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: