Re: Committed updates don't seem to be committed.
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Committed updates don't seem to be committed. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200406231024.51964.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Committed updates don't seem to be committed. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Tom, Frank, > I do not recall hearing from any satisfied users of > Hibernate-on-Postgres before ... in fact I never heard of Hibernate > before ... so call me clueless if you like, but a few rough edges in the > interface don't seem too implausible from here. Actually, I have a client using Hibernate, and they've not had a problem with it. I'm no java expert (I hire those), but I was favorably impressed with the software --and with its level of compatibility with PostgreSQL. Not so Jakarta. Every client we've had using Jakarta has required help from a pg-JDBC expert in debugging and configuration; apparently the way Jakarta comes "out of the box" is barely usable with PG. So this is a possible source of problems. Frank, from you description of your problems, I can see only 2 possibilities: 1) You are not connecting to the database you think you are. Possibly you're still connecting to "test"? Or different parts of the system have their own connection info? 2) Some part of your stack, due to configuration issues, is opening transactions for each batch of DML statements and not closing them. These non-committed statements, of course, would be automatically rolled back on a database restart or after connection termination. This is a problem I've seen on *lots* of Java applications. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: