Re: New News Entry
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New News Entry |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200406191201.20722.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New News Entry ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
Tom, > > Personally I think it's reasonable to have some guidelines, not > > hard rules. In this case maybe we could suggest a time constraint: > > "major release" announcements are ok if they're at least a year apart. > > (Or six months, or whatever we feel is appropriate.) Absolutely. The reason why I brought it up is that it's apparent that not everyone on this list, even, agrees what the guidelines ought to be. We need a consensus. > But, I do agree about the time constraints ... maybe throw in a 'past > track record' also? Well, that's where we make exceptions, sometimes. For example, if OpenACS sent us an announcement that wasn't a major release, we might put it up anyway -- becuase they're very friendly to postgres, they're OSS, and they have yet to post an announcement of any kind. Bricolage, on the other hand, we'd stick to the "rules"; David sends me an announcement every patch release. for instance, we release 7.5.0, and it will generally > be ~1 month before 7.5.1 comes out, but it may be 3 before 7.5.2 does ... Oh, for the PostgreSQL project we post whatever we want. It *is* the postgresql.org web site, after all. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: