Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum Software
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum Software |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040617021709.GD5925@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum Software ("Donnacha Mac Gloinn" <postgresql.org@donnacha.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin
Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:23:44PM -0800, Donnacha Mac Gloinn wrote: > In a recent thread in the official vb forum > (http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=97747&highlight=PostgreSQL), > one Pgsql advocate sang its praises, in particular advanced indexing, > and a vb developer, Scott MacVicar, responded "I love Postgresql too but > they are missing a vital part that we've become dependant on..". He > then linked to the Pgsql ToDo list and indicated that the current lack > of " Allow INSERT INTO tab (col1, ..) VALUES (val1, ..), (val2, ..)" was > his bone of contention there. You got to be kidding. Are you saying that they can't work around the lack of this SELECT syntax, but that they _did_ work around the lack of stored procedures (and who knows what else) in MySQL? Is there _no other_ feature they miss in PostgreSQL? Anyway, if they want a feature, they can as well fund development of it. INSERT with multiple values can't be that hard -- it's never been implemented because there has been no real push for it. I don't foresee it being implemented in any short term future. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without"
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: