Re: Opteron scaling with PostgreSQL
От | jseymour@linxnet.com (Jim Seymour) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Opteron scaling with PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040612192655.0A783430E@jimsun.linxnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Opteron scaling with PostgreSQL (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 07:19:05AM -0400, Jim Seymour wrote: > > "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com> wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > Another important point is that the data in an organization is always > > > more valuable than the hardware and the software. > > > > > > Hose up the hardware and the software, and insurance gets new stuff. > > > > > > Hose up the data and you are really hosed for good. > > > > It's amazing, how many people don't seem to get that. > > It's often not true. > > I use postgresql for massive data-mining of a bunch of high-update > rate data sources. The value of the data decreases rapidly as it > ages. Data over a month old is worthless. Data over a week old has > very little value. [snip] > Good argument and well-made. So s/always/frequently/ in Dann Corbit's comments. Perhaps even "most often." The point is: Many people, some even so-called "SysAdmins," will compromise on hardware and software, apparently w/o thought to the fact that the unique, original, irreplaceable data that hardware and software is handling is indeed valuable and (possibly) irreplaceable. Jim
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: