Re: Why hash indexes suck
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why hash indexes suck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200406100335.i5A3Z4w07634@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why hash indexes suck ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why hash indexes suck
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO: * Order heap pointers on hash index pages by hash value and ctid --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > > > We could safely sort on the hash value, but I'm not sure how effective > > that would be, considering that we're talking about values that already > > hashed into the same bucket --- there's likely not to be very many > > distinct hash values there. > > I think we can safely put that on the todo list. > The existing hash algorithm is very good. So I would on the > contrary beleive that only a few keys share a hash value per pagesized bucket. > For the equal keys case it does not matter since we want all of the rows anyways. > For the equal hash value case it would probably be best to sort by ctid. > > TODO ?: order heap pointers inside hash index pages by hash value and ctid > > Andreas > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: