Re: Frequently updated tables

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:49:20PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >I love PG, I've been using it since version 6x, and it has gotten
> >fantastic over the years, and in many cases, I would choose it over
> >Oracle, but for systems that need frequent updates, I have a lot of
> >concerns.
> 
> ...that's the price you pay for concurrency man...

Also he said that the problem was solved with enough lazy VACUUM
scheduling.  I don't understand why he doesn't want to use that
solution.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"People get annoyed when you try to debug them."  (Larry Wall)