Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040609153240.M95501@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 04:07:27AM -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote: > > On Sat, 29 May 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Ah, this seems to work. I'll implement it and I'll let you know how it > > > goes. > > > > Ugh... There's one further wrinkle I hadn't thought about, imagine the > > following: > > Ok Stephan, thank you very much for your help. I implemented this and > it seems to work, at least on my (limited?) test scenario. If you have > some spare time I'd like you to test it and see if you can break it (I > posted it to -patches yesterday). Unfortunately, I've gotten it to fail, but I haven't looked in depth (I'm at work, so I'm doing it during compilations and such.) I made a file ins with a 1000000 line copy to a table named fk with the value 1, and then if I do the following: create table pk(a int primary key); create table fk(a int references pk(a) initially deferred); insert into pk values (1); begin; begin; \i ins \i ins rollback; \i ins commit; It appears to exception on the third \i ins with the tail_thisxact pointing into a bad place.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: